Oh, it is not an objection! I mean, you have given some arguments that go against the use of citizen juries for general policy issues. Still you think juries are good for that use case.
But for expert panels, there are not substantial arguments against choice by sortision!. Still the US President (and often european parliaments) chose supreme justices. I am quite pessimistic because this mechanism is not used even when its superiority is almost impossible to dispute.
Sortision is not used even for expert panels (including high courts), where objections are truly inexistent.
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/PyqPr4z76Z8xGZL22/sortition
I’m not sure what point you’re making.
Oh, it is not an objection! I mean, you have given some arguments that go against the use of citizen juries for general policy issues. Still you think juries are good for that use case.
But for expert panels, there are not substantial arguments against choice by sortision!. Still the US President (and often european parliaments) chose supreme justices. I am quite pessimistic because this mechanism is not used even when its superiority is almost impossible to dispute.
you could have said the same thing about approval voting, but then we got it passed in Fargo by a 64% supermajority.