It sounds like youāve given the possibility of information hazards careful attention, recognised the value of consulting others, and made reasonable decisions. (I expected you probably wouldāve done soājust thought itād be worth asking.)
I also definitely agree that the possibility of information hazards shouldnāt just serve as a blanket, argument-ending reason to not fairly publicly discuss any potentially dangerous technologies, and that it always has to be weighed against the potential benefits of such discussion.
It sounds like youāve given the possibility of information hazards careful attention, recognised the value of consulting others, and made reasonable decisions. (I expected you probably wouldāve done soājust thought itād be worth asking.)
I also definitely agree that the possibility of information hazards shouldnāt just serve as a blanket, argument-ending reason to not fairly publicly discuss any potentially dangerous technologies, and that it always has to be weighed against the potential benefits of such discussion.