Always struggled to understand who these are supposed to be for. Politicians and policymakers don’t know or care about what an acausal trade is, and I suspect a lot of this piece is just too ‘out there’ to be persuasive to someone who spends most of their day doing ordinary politics. Is it supposed to be for the people who will then persuade the politicians? Something else? Very confused
My guess is that politician’s staffers read it, and also that it elevates the status of the authors such that they are likelier to be taken on to advise. I presume it’s less likely Daniel Kokatajlo would have been interviewed by Bernie Sanders if he hadn’t written AI 2027.
The smart thing in the framing here is that politicians will soon (hopefully) be reaching for more comprehensive plans on what to do about AI. And this is called ‘Plan A’. So it’s not crazy to think that something like this may end up influencing legislation.
Always struggled to understand who these are supposed to be for. Politicians and policymakers don’t know or care about what an acausal trade is, and I suspect a lot of this piece is just too ‘out there’ to be persuasive to someone who spends most of their day doing ordinary politics. Is it supposed to be for the people who will then persuade the politicians? Something else? Very confused
My guess is that politician’s staffers read it, and also that it elevates the status of the authors such that they are likelier to be taken on to advise. I presume it’s less likely Daniel Kokatajlo would have been interviewed by Bernie Sanders if he hadn’t written AI 2027.
The smart thing in the framing here is that politicians will soon (hopefully) be reaching for more comprehensive plans on what to do about AI. And this is called ‘Plan A’. So it’s not crazy to think that something like this may end up influencing legislation.