This is awesome. I really liked how you considered both short term and long term, clear and diffuse effects, and noted how they changed your confidence.
It seems like this should be highly valuable for:
People working in animal advocacy
For donors who want to make their own judgements about which interventions to support
For other researchers who want to build on this, or to identify how different assumptions lead to support for different causes.
I agree with @david_reinstein that it would be nice to see this made into a more visually polished and navigable form, but in terms of the content itself I found it very easy to understand the reasoning and assessments.
Great, thanks Tristan! That’s really good to hear, and noted re. the formatting. And yes, we definitely hope that other researchers will build on this and challenge us so that we can continually improve it.
This is awesome. I really liked how you considered both short term and long term, clear and diffuse effects, and noted how they changed your confidence.
It seems like this should be highly valuable for:
People working in animal advocacy
For donors who want to make their own judgements about which interventions to support
For other researchers who want to build on this, or to identify how different assumptions lead to support for different causes.
I agree with @david_reinstein that it would be nice to see this made into a more visually polished and navigable form, but in terms of the content itself I found it very easy to understand the reasoning and assessments.
Great, thanks Tristan! That’s really good to hear, and noted re. the formatting. And yes, we definitely hope that other researchers will build on this and challenge us so that we can continually improve it.