Another thought that came to mind when thinking about this, is whether we should emphasize more on the possibility of a good fit arising from some form of tipping-point analysis.
This is based on the criticisms made by Antonin Broi on the inadequacy of the ITN framework for analyzing opportunities for systemic change, considering the case where there might not be decreasing marginal returns. This can be solved by putting aside neglectedness and instead thinking of tractability as a general function (see here).
What this could translate to in terms of advice is emphasizing that climate change could be a good fit when people are well positioned to exert a crucial (close to tipping point) influence on policy change.
I agree with everything here.
Another thought that came to mind when thinking about this, is whether we should emphasize more on the possibility of a good fit arising from some form of tipping-point analysis.
This is based on the criticisms made by Antonin Broi on the inadequacy of the ITN framework for analyzing opportunities for systemic change, considering the case where there might not be decreasing marginal returns. This can be solved by putting aside neglectedness and instead thinking of tractability as a general function (see here).
What this could translate to in terms of advice is emphasizing that climate change could be a good fit when people are well positioned to exert a crucial (close to tipping point) influence on policy change.