What do you think about Bob Fischer’s argument that even if one is not a hedonist, pleasure/​pain should still be a big enough part of welfare (say at least 10%) such that one shouldn’t discount Rethink’s moral weights by more than an order of magnitude or so?
I agree with that consent, and i’m actually about to do an entire post on this. I think the hedonist element is only one important animal favoring juncture—see what you think of the post tomorrow!
What do you think about Bob Fischer’s argument that even if one is not a hedonist, pleasure/​pain should still be a big enough part of welfare (say at least 10%) such that one shouldn’t discount Rethink’s moral weights by more than an order of magnitude or so?
I agree with that consent, and i’m actually about to do an entire post on this. I think the hedonist element is only one important animal favoring juncture—see what you think of the post tomorrow!
Nice; looking forward to it!