I like the idea of operationalizing the Agree/Disagree as probability that the statement is true. So “Agree” is 100%, neutral is 50%, disagree is 0%. In this case, 20% vs 40% means something concrete.
I wonder if we’d rather capture something like “how strongly this is true” (e.g. would $100m be much better spent on animals...) which captures both confidence and importance.
That’s helpful- thanks! Should be an easy one to fix next time.
I like the idea of operationalizing the Agree/Disagree as probability that the statement is true. So “Agree” is 100%, neutral is 50%, disagree is 0%. In this case, 20% vs 40% means something concrete.
I wonder if we’d rather capture something like “how strongly this is true” (e.g. would $100m be much better spent on animals...) which captures both confidence and importance.
That sounds great too. Perhaps both axes labels should be possible and it should just be specified for each question asked.