thanks for the thorough reply! I apologize for not contacting you for comment before publishing this post.
You’re right, GWWC mentions conflicts of interest on the other page. Sorry for overlooking that and misrepresenting the facts. I don’t believe the organizations actively hide their relationship. I’d like to see it mentioned more prominently anyways.
I’m looking forward to the Longtermism Fund’s report, glad to hear that it’s coming!
On governance/independence: I don’t believe GWWC is currently facing significant pressures to act against the best interest of the community, but I’m not convinced it’s well-enough protected for that to stay the case.
Overall, your answer makes me trust GWWC and EVF a fair bit more!
Hello Michael,
thanks for the thorough reply! I apologize for not contacting you for comment before publishing this post.
You’re right, GWWC mentions conflicts of interest on the other page. Sorry for overlooking that and misrepresenting the facts. I don’t believe the organizations actively hide their relationship. I’d like to see it mentioned more prominently anyways.
I’m looking forward to the Longtermism Fund’s report, glad to hear that it’s coming!
On governance/independence: I don’t believe GWWC is currently facing significant pressures to act against the best interest of the community, but I’m not convinced it’s well-enough protected for that to stay the case.
Overall, your answer makes me trust GWWC and EVF a fair bit more!