My reply didn’t substantively responds to any point you made in your comment, because I don’t feel your comment is substantively countering or commenting on the arguments of the articles. As I said, it’s based on a narrow build up section.
The answer is not straightforward. it’s like people seeing sun moving in sky and saying it’s straightforward that earth is in center. Read arguments against the “straightforward” answer before concluding.
Well, I can’t help it if you find it implausible. All the words in that paragraph and article are necessary to make the point and express the idea precisely.
I didn’t say “it is the transcript of the video”. I said “it is based on the the transcript of the video”. There’s redesign, restructure, coherence, narration, etc added to it. Think of it like movie adaptation of a novel.
My reply didn’t substantively responds to any point you made in your comment, because I don’t feel your comment is substantively countering or commenting on the arguments of the articles. As I said, it’s based on a narrow build up section.
The answer is not straightforward. it’s like people seeing sun moving in sky and saying it’s straightforward that earth is in center. Read arguments against the “straightforward” answer before concluding.
Well, I can’t help it if you find it implausible. All the words in that paragraph and article are necessary to make the point and express the idea precisely.
I didn’t say “it is the transcript of the video”. I said “it is based on the the transcript of the video”. There’s redesign, restructure, coherence, narration, etc added to it. Think of it like movie adaptation of a novel.