Hmm agreed with some caveats. Eg, for many people’s ethics, saving infants/newborns is unusually important, whereas preventing extinction is an unweighted average. So that will marginally tip the balance in favor of the global health charities.
On the other hand, you might expect increasing donations by 1% (say) to have higher marginal EV than 1% of doubling donations.
Hmm agreed with some caveats. Eg, for many people’s ethics, saving infants/newborns is unusually important, whereas preventing extinction is an unweighted average. So that will marginally tip the balance in favor of the global health charities.
On the other hand, you might expect increasing donations by 1% (say) to have higher marginal EV than 1% of doubling donations.