I think this may have been a misunderstanding, because I also misunderstood your comment at first. At first you refer simply to the people who play the biggest role in shaping AGI—but then later (and in this comment) you refer to people who contribute most to making AGI go well—a very important distinction!
I’m sure it was a misunderstanding, but fwiw, in the first paragraph, I do say “positive contributors” by which I meant people having a positive impact.
I think this may have been a misunderstanding, because I also misunderstood your comment at first. At first you refer simply to the people who play the biggest role in shaping AGI—but then later (and in this comment) you refer to people who contribute most to making AGI go well—a very important distinction!
I’m sure it was a misunderstanding, but fwiw, in the first paragraph, I do say “positive contributors” by which I meant people having a positive impact.