Iām probably less informed than you are, but depending on what you mean by āsources of fundersā I disagree.
I think if you can demonstrate getting valuable results and want funding to scale, people will be happy to fund you. My impression is that several people influencing >=6 digit allocations are genuinely looking for projects to fund that can be even more effective than what theyāre currently funding.
Iām fairly confident that if anyone hosted a conference or online program, got good results, had a clear theory of change with measurable metrics, and gradually asked for funding to scale, people will be happy to fund that.
Ah sorry I should have just said ā3 main /ā larger scale fundersā (op, eaif + meta funding circle). Funders from those groups include individuals.
But I was also unclear in my commentāIāll clarify this soon.
Iām probably less informed than you are, but depending on what you mean by āsources of fundersā I disagree.
I think if you can demonstrate getting valuable results and want funding to scale, people will be happy to fund you. My impression is that several people influencing >=6 digit allocations are genuinely looking for projects to fund that can be even more effective than what theyāre currently funding.
Iām fairly confident that if anyone hosted a conference or online program, got good results, had a clear theory of change with measurable metrics, and gradually asked for funding to scale, people will be happy to fund that.
Ah sorry I should have just said ā3 main /ā larger scale fundersā (op, eaif + meta funding circle). Funders from those groups include individuals.
But I was also unclear in my commentāIāll clarify this soon.