What aspect of it do you think is absurd? My impression is that most EAs would rather not take credit for OpenAI, and many OAI staff are similarly skeptical about EA, but it nonetheless is the case that EA seems to have been relatively influential in the founding of OAI, development of key technologies like RLHF, and some OAI staff are to this day motivated by EA principles. Their roles are listed on the 80k job board as one (bad) metric.
Interesting take on what is considered an âEA orgâ, I think I was talking cross purposes a little. I agree absurd might be too strong a word.
I completely agree EA has been influential in founding OAI, and developing key technologies, and that some of the staff are motivated by EA principles, and that their roles are listed on the 80k job board (which personally I donât agree with but thatâs a whole nother discussion).
My (relatively uninformed) take is that EAs were at least a significant part of OpenAIâs foundation and growth, but now the vast majority of EAs (I would guess 60-80%) would consider OpenAIâs existence quite a significant net negative to the world and so it would no longer be considered an âEA orgâ, even if it was at some stage.
Would be an interesting thing to do a poll on actually, @Nathan Young ? âDo you consider OpenAI to be an âEA Organisationâ.
What aspect of it do you think is absurd? My impression is that most EAs would rather not take credit for OpenAI, and many OAI staff are similarly skeptical about EA, but it nonetheless is the case that EA seems to have been relatively influential in the founding of OAI, development of key technologies like RLHF, and some OAI staff are to this day motivated by EA principles. Their roles are listed on the 80k job board as one (bad) metric.
Interesting take on what is considered an âEA orgâ, I think I was talking cross purposes a little. I agree absurd might be too strong a word.
I completely agree EA has been influential in founding OAI, and developing key technologies, and that some of the staff are motivated by EA principles, and that their roles are listed on the 80k job board (which personally I donât agree with but thatâs a whole nother discussion).
My (relatively uninformed) take is that EAs were at least a significant part of OpenAIâs foundation and growth, but now the vast majority of EAs (I would guess 60-80%) would consider OpenAIâs existence quite a significant net negative to the world and so it would no longer be considered an âEA orgâ, even if it was at some stage.
Would be an interesting thing to do a poll on actually, @Nathan Young ?
âDo you consider OpenAI to be an âEA Organisationâ.