“A(G)I could radically change X” is a way weaker claim than “working on A(G)I is the best way to tackle X”. You only defend the former here.
The claim is “AGI will radically change X”. And I tried to argue that if you cared about X and wanted to impact it, basically on the first order you could calculate your impact on it just by measuring your impact on AGI.
“A(G)I could radically change X” is a way weaker claim than “working on A(G)I is the best way to tackle X”. You only defend the former here.
The claim is “AGI will radically change X”. And I tried to argue that if you cared about X and wanted to impact it, basically on the first order you could calculate your impact on it just by measuring your impact on AGI.