I don’t find the words to describe how disturbing your writing is. “It seems” “supporting EAs” “good use” “can be trusted”. I hope there are no Ukrainian people here to read this. Only EAs can be trusted? How about animal activists, how about normal people who need help? They can’t be trusted? Based on what you are making these assumptions Charles? What data about Ukrainians do you have? I am suggesting being a bit more mindful with your language.
No, of course not, that’s a terrible misreading. But when someone is trying to hack your account, or if there is a war, you cannot trust automatically!
I don’t find the words to describe how disturbing your writing is. “It seems” “supporting EAs” “good use” “can be trusted”. I hope there are no Ukrainian people here to read this. Only EAs can be trusted? How about animal activists, how about normal people who need help? They can’t be trusted? Based on what you are making these assumptions Charles? What data about Ukrainians do you have? I am suggesting being a bit more mindful with your language.
No, of course not, that’s a terrible misreading. But when someone is trying to hack your account, or if there is a war, you cannot trust automatically!
A implies B does not mean only A implies B.