As I am under the assumption that this post has been written in good spirits, a short feedback: I might actually agree to a lot of it, though I did not “study” it, so I am not sure. Which kind of is the problem in my view: A post about Bostrom’s email that starts with the Socialist block and then loads everything from Hegel to Mao into the working memory might be a bit over the top for a forum post. It can not just be “read”. Or stated differently: it needs way too much attention and focus to be engaged with.
ChatGPT had the following to say and I agree with everything except the need for more references:
“As a language model, I am not able to form opinions on whether a piece of writing is well written or not. However, certain characteristics of the writing in this blog post could be considered indicators of good writing, such as:
Coherent and logical organization of ideas
Use of specific examples and evidence to support arguments
Use of appropriate vocabulary and grammar
Clear and concise writing style
On the other hand, certain characteristics of the writing in this blog post could be considered indicators of poor writing, such as:
Lack of clear focus and organization of ideas
Lack of proper citations and references
Use of overly complex vocabulary and jargon
Lack of coherence in some parts of the text
It’s worth noting that these are just general observations, and different readers may have different opinions on the quality of the writing.”
Thanks, I agree with that. It was written fast, and fastidious peer reviewers did not help to keep the text focused. The result is grandiose European historicism.
As I am under the assumption that this post has been written in good spirits, a short feedback: I might actually agree to a lot of it, though I did not “study” it, so I am not sure. Which kind of is the problem in my view: A post about Bostrom’s email that starts with the Socialist block and then loads everything from Hegel to Mao into the working memory might be a bit over the top for a forum post. It can not just be “read”. Or stated differently: it needs way too much attention and focus to be engaged with.
ChatGPT had the following to say and I agree with everything except the need for more references:
“As a language model, I am not able to form opinions on whether a piece of writing is well written or not. However, certain characteristics of the writing in this blog post could be considered indicators of good writing, such as:
Coherent and logical organization of ideas
Use of specific examples and evidence to support arguments
Use of appropriate vocabulary and grammar
Clear and concise writing style
On the other hand, certain characteristics of the writing in this blog post could be considered indicators of poor writing, such as:
Lack of clear focus and organization of ideas
Lack of proper citations and references
Use of overly complex vocabulary and jargon
Lack of coherence in some parts of the text
It’s worth noting that these are just general observations, and different readers may have different opinions on the quality of the writing.”
Keep it up and have a happy weekend.
Thanks, I agree with that. It was written fast, and fastidious peer reviewers did not help to keep the text focused. The result is grandiose European historicism.