That seems plausible, and I don’t know if I disagree. But I think a core EA org itself naming this post as being about “flaws” may more clearly signal genuine self-awareness and eagerness to engage with criticism and adapt in response to it. And I think those things are key virtues of EA and key parts of the “EA brand”, so highlighting them could be quite media savvy.
In contrast, “room for improvement” could sound a bit more like a sanitised/hollow corporate version of that. Perhaps.
That seems plausible, and I don’t know if I disagree. But I think a core EA org itself naming this post as being about “flaws” may more clearly signal genuine self-awareness and eagerness to engage with criticism and adapt in response to it. And I think those things are key virtues of EA and key parts of the “EA brand”, so highlighting them could be quite media savvy.
In contrast, “room for improvement” could sound a bit more like a sanitised/hollow corporate version of that. Perhaps.