Hi Vasco, thanks for the question! I think our ideal approach would look like what you suggest: i.e., us doing all our evaluations within each cause area in parallel. This would make it easier for us to be as consistent as possible in the standards we are applying to the evaluators and be more comparative. Unfortunately, in practice this hasn’t worked out in the past based on our own capacity constraints and difficulty coordinating evaluations to all occur at the same time. That said, where possible we still try to do at least two parallel evaluations in each cause area (although even this isn’t always possible).
Hi Vasco, thanks for the question! I think our ideal approach would look like what you suggest: i.e., us doing all our evaluations within each cause area in parallel. This would make it easier for us to be as consistent as possible in the standards we are applying to the evaluators and be more comparative. Unfortunately, in practice this hasn’t worked out in the past based on our own capacity constraints and difficulty coordinating evaluations to all occur at the same time. That said, where possible we still try to do at least two parallel evaluations in each cause area (although even this isn’t always possible).
I see.