The distinction between scientists and philosophers of science doesn’t massively seem apt. Their work is primarily critical, similar to the work of sociologists of science or STS scholars rather than philosophers of science
Yeah that’s fair. Depends on the particular researcher, they’re quite eclectic. Some are even further removed, like the difference between scientists and literary criticism of a novel about scientists (see e.g. this paper on Frederic Jameson).
The distinction between scientists and philosophers of science doesn’t massively seem apt. Their work is primarily critical, similar to the work of sociologists of science or STS scholars rather than philosophers of science
Yeah that’s fair. Depends on the particular researcher, they’re quite eclectic. Some are even further removed, like the difference between scientists and literary criticism of a novel about scientists (see e.g. this paper on Frederic Jameson).