We would love to get critical feedback (read: free labor) on our evaluation of EA Melbourne, and/or on the comparison to our past evaluations. In the future we may post more projects in the comments and ask for input into their evaluations. Do people think that is worthwhile?
“”″
Some parts of this application may be published and discussed publicly. We will encourage respectful discussion, but there may nevertheless be critical comments. Do you give us permission to publish the sections “The project” and “Optional information”?
The contents may also be the subject of arguments, and may be evaluated erratically or indefensibly.
“”″
Many people marked part or all of their application as private, and we would of course respect that. But it may still be worth asking more specifically.
We would love to get critical feedback (read: free labor) on our evaluation of EA Melbourne, and/or on the comparison to our past evaluations. In the future we may post more projects in the comments and ask for input into their evaluations. Do people think that is worthwhile?
It might put people off submitting projects—I think one ought to ask for permission in these cases.
That’s fair. Right now the application says:
“”″ Some parts of this application may be published and discussed publicly. We will encourage respectful discussion, but there may nevertheless be critical comments. Do you give us permission to publish the sections “The project” and “Optional information”?
The contents may also be the subject of arguments, and may be evaluated erratically or indefensibly. “”″
Many people marked part or all of their application as private, and we would of course respect that. But it may still be worth asking more specifically.
I’d definitely like to see more insight into what you didn’t choose to fund and why.