Downvoted this post, but not the other near-identical post.
I question the value of this format, as opposed to a post that makes the subtext explicit and just presents a single list of policies with the socialist and capitalist language together. Sometimes, being ironic and using subtext works well (I liked it in your meat consumption/donation post), but in this case I’m imagining someone reading this post, then reading the other one, then becoming annoyed that they wasted some time being “tricked” in a place where we’re meant to focus on clarity and transparency.
>I question the value of this format, as opposed to a post that makes the subtext explicit and just presents a single list of policies with the socialist and capitalist language together
Easier to share with different people. Plus they are not identical policies. It isn’t “ironic”.
Downvoted this post, but not the other near-identical post.
I question the value of this format, as opposed to a post that makes the subtext explicit and just presents a single list of policies with the socialist and capitalist language together. Sometimes, being ironic and using subtext works well (I liked it in your meat consumption/donation post), but in this case I’m imagining someone reading this post, then reading the other one, then becoming annoyed that they wasted some time being “tricked” in a place where we’re meant to focus on clarity and transparency.
>I question the value of this format, as opposed to a post that makes the subtext explicit and just presents a single list of policies with the socialist and capitalist language together
Easier to share with different people. Plus they are not identical policies. It isn’t “ironic”.