I just originally thought that the All Grants fund has stuff with a decent evidence base, but less certainty then the top charities. So still more certainty than most other funders in the world.
Nearly all of the charities there would fit that description so I think they were following that practice. So yes I thought they were making a mistake somewhat by their own lights, or maybe taking the fund in a bit of a different direction.
Or Maybe I was just wrong about what they were trying to do.
I just originally thought that the All Grants fund has stuff with a decent evidence base, but less certainty then the top charities. So still more certainty than most other funders in the world.
Nearly all of the charities there would fit that description so I think they were following that practice. So yes I thought they were making a mistake somewhat by their own lights, or maybe taking the fund in a bit of a different direction.
Or Maybe I was just wrong about what they were trying to do.