The EA Forum Team is working on building subforums. Our vision is to build more specific spaces for discussion of topics related to EA, while still allowing content to bubble up to the Frontpage.
The user problem we are thinking of targeting is: As someone who cares about X, I find it hard to find posts I’m interested in, and I don’t know if the EA Forum is a useful place for me to post ideas or keep up with X.
Would solving this be useful for you? If so, what spaces, topics, or causes would you be interested in seeing such discussion spaces for?
Note: if you’ve seen our current bioethics and software engineering subforums, note that these are not the final state of the feature, and we are still designing and iterating.
Government, policy, foreign affairs.
I need to ask questions and introduce topics related to AI policy without needing to worry about risks from uninformed people misinterpreting, or even misusing, the information. This is a very serious problem on EAforum and Lesswrong.
Yes, and I would love a meta-research/rationality/socioepistemology subforum!
It would be usefwl because it might get easier to find and talk to the people who are especially interested in the topic. And because posts on the frontpage gets eaten by the time window in a swish and a swosh, it rarely leads to lasting discussion and people feel like they have to hurry (which is partly positive, partly negative).
The tag system would work just the same if people used it (I would actually prefer it), but since tag usage is inconsistent, people can’t rely on it.[1]
Solutions to inconsistent tag usage could be to prevent people from clicking the “post” button before they’ve added at least one tag, or paying someone to manually tag posts, or making an AI help you do it, etc.
(There are more arguments why subforums would be cool, but I shouldn’t be spending time elucidating them rn unless anyone’s curious >.<)