His response is so uncharitable and demeaning I’m not sure it’s worth Larks’ time and effort to respond.
That’s just Red’s mannerisms, he’s just saying it because he likes being humorous. He’s a pretty nice guy, though if he were writing this response right now it’d be a lot more smartassy.
That’s the entirety of his response to what Larks pointed out, a confusion I share.
Well he did address (most) of his arguments, despite his memey attitude. I don’t think being a bit of a dick negates any arguments he made.
That’s just Red’s mannerisms, he’s just saying it because he likes being humorous. He’s a pretty nice guy, though if he were writing this response right now it’d be a lot more smartassy.
Well he did address (most) of his arguments, despite his memey attitude. I don’t think being a bit of a dick negates any arguments he made.
What do you think of his original post?