[Question] Net value of saving a child’s life from a negative utilitarian perspective?

Naively, to someone with a negative utilitarian perspective, saving lives is a net harm, because those individuals will have some suffering in the remainder of their lives. However, the death of children might cause more psychological pain for others than if they survived to old age. Has anyone looked into how such a “grief differential” compares to the typical amount of suffering in a human life?

I ask as an increasingly committed negative utilitarian starting to take seriously the idea that maybe I should stop doing things that save kids’ lives.

No comments.