Good spot. A single election result should produce <1% change of global climate change action, right? Changing 10% of USA senators to democrat could arguably cause like 1% change in that probability....
The CBA was for the US EPA actions announced by President Obama (although future Presidents will be able to undo them, so it’s questionable to count it as ‘done’ by a single President).
If it were intense long-term global climate action to keep below 2 degrees Celsius of warming, the estimated benefits would be measured in trillions, not billions.
Good spot. A single election result should produce <1% change of global climate change action, right? Changing 10% of USA senators to democrat could arguably cause like 1% change in that probability....
The CBA was for the US EPA actions announced by President Obama (although future Presidents will be able to undo them, so it’s questionable to count it as ‘done’ by a single President).
If it were intense long-term global climate action to keep below 2 degrees Celsius of warming, the estimated benefits would be measured in trillions, not billions.