âThereâs no life bad enough for us to try to actively extinguish it when the subject itself canât express a will for thatââholding this view while also thinking that itâs good to prevent the existence of factory farmed chickens would need some explaining IMO.
Also, the claim that Michaelâs line of reasoning is âweird and badâ seems to imply that it being âweirdâ should count against it in some way, just as it being âbadâ should count against it. But why/âhow exactly? After all, from most peopleâs perspective caring about shrimp at all is weird.
Yeah, I agree the cases seem very different.
âThereâs no life bad enough for us to try to actively extinguish it when the subject itself canât express a will for thatââholding this view while also thinking that itâs good to prevent the existence of factory farmed chickens would need some explaining IMO.
Also, the claim that Michaelâs line of reasoning is âweird and badâ seems to imply that it being âweirdâ should count against it in some way, just as it being âbadâ should count against it. But why/âhow exactly? After all, from most peopleâs perspective caring about shrimp at all is weird.
Agreed that this seems nonsensical on its face.