Summary: Kotlikoff et al. hold that standard integrated assessment models (IAM), including Nordhaus’s most recent 2017 version, rely implicitly on intergenerational altruism and pay no attention to the intergenerational distribution of welfare. The authors propose a model that optimizes for a Pareto improvement for all future generations and compensates current generations for the cost of providing this future improvement. The model proposes an initial carbon tax of $70 per cubic ton of CO2, rising at 1.5% per year (in contrast to Nordhaus’s latest, which proposes a $30 initial tax, growing at the same 1.5% rate), improving all generations’ welfare by an estimated 5%.
Abstract:
Carbon taxation has been studied primarily in social planner or infinitely lived agent models, which trade off the welfare of future and current generations. Such frameworks obscure the potential for carbon taxation to produce a generational win-win. This paper develops a large-scale, dynamic 55-period, OLG model to calculate the carbon tax policy delivering the highest uniform welfare gain to all generations. The OLG framework, with its selfish generations, seems far more natural for studying climate damage. Our model features coal, oil, and gas, each extracted subject to increasing costs, a clean energy sector, technical and demographic change, and Nordhaus (2017)’s temperature/damage functions. Our model’s optimal uniform welfare increasing (UWI) carbon tax starts at $30 tax, rises annually at 1.5 percent and raises the welfare of all current and future generations by 0.73 percent on a consumption-equivalent basis. Sharing efficiency gains evenly requires, however, taxing future generations by as much as 8.1 percent and subsidizing early generations by as much as 1.2 percent of lifetime consumption. Without such redistribution (the Nordhaus “optimum”), the carbon tax constitutes a win-lose policy with current generations experiencing an up to 0.84 percent welfare loss and future generations experiencing an up to 7.54 percent welfare gain. With a six-times larger damage function, the optimal UWI initial carbon tax is $70, again rising annually at 1.5 percent. This policy raises all generations’ welfare by almost 5 percent. However, doing so requires levying taxes on and giving transfers to future and current generations ranging up to 50.1 percent and 10.3 percent of their lifetime consumption.
Kotlikoff et al., ‘Making Carbon Taxation a Generational Win Win’
This is a linkpost for https://kotlikoff.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Optimal_Carbon_Taxation_in_a_Large_Scale_OLG_Model_3_30_19-11.pdf, also available at NBER
Summary: Kotlikoff et al. hold that standard integrated assessment models (IAM), including Nordhaus’s most recent 2017 version, rely implicitly on intergenerational altruism and pay no attention to the intergenerational distribution of welfare. The authors propose a model that optimizes for a Pareto improvement for all future generations and compensates current generations for the cost of providing this future improvement. The model proposes an initial carbon tax of $70 per cubic ton of CO2, rising at 1.5% per year (in contrast to Nordhaus’s latest, which proposes a $30 initial tax, growing at the same 1.5% rate), improving all generations’ welfare by an estimated 5%.
Abstract: