Thanks for both of these answers! I’m pleasantly surprised by the strength and clarity of the positive feedback (even if some of it may result from the Cambridge name, as you speculated). I’m also surprised at the sheer number of submissions to these groups, and glad to see that CSER’s material stands out.
Most of our submissions are in collaboration with other leading scholars/​organisations, e.g. FHI/​GovAI and CFI, so credit should rightly be shared. (We tend to coordinate with other leading orgs/​scholars when considering a submission, which often naturally leads to joint submission).
Thanks for both of these answers! I’m pleasantly surprised by the strength and clarity of the positive feedback (even if some of it may result from the Cambridge name, as you speculated). I’m also surprised at the sheer number of submissions to these groups, and glad to see that CSER’s material stands out.
Thanks Aaron!
Most of our submissions are in collaboration with other leading scholars/​organisations, e.g. FHI/​GovAI and CFI, so credit should rightly be shared. (We tend to coordinate with other leading orgs/​scholars when considering a submission, which often naturally leads to joint submission).