I currently use Timing.app, and have been recommending it to people. Is donethat different in any ways? (TBC, “it has all the same features but also supports an E2G effort” would be sufficient reason for me to consider switching).
Hey cb, thanks for sharing, will add it to my alternatives list. From what it looks like timing.app is more mature but uses a different approach that could lead to less accurate results. To me it looks like it mainly uses active windows (like you’re on chrome, on slack, etc.) while DoneThat analyzes your actual screen and thereby gets more detailed data for better understanding. Would be curious if you’d run them side by side how it works for you.
DoneThat is also significantly cheaper (at least for now) and Christoph is very responsive to feedback/requests (once replied to an email within 6 minutes)
Cool, thanks for sharing!
I currently use Timing.app, and have been recommending it to people. Is donethat different in any ways? (TBC, “it has all the same features but also supports an E2G effort” would be sufficient reason for me to consider switching).
Hey cb, thanks for sharing, will add it to my alternatives list. From what it looks like timing.app is more mature but uses a different approach that could lead to less accurate results. To me it looks like it mainly uses active windows (like you’re on chrome, on slack, etc.) while DoneThat analyzes your actual screen and thereby gets more detailed data for better understanding. Would be curious if you’d run them side by side how it works for you.
DoneThat is also significantly cheaper (at least for now) and Christoph is very responsive to feedback/requests (once replied to an email within 6 minutes)