Another point to keep in mind is that fairness and high impact is impossible to achieve both at the same time, and that continuous fighting is therefore guaranteed between those that aim for high impact and those that want fairness or equality.
Also another impossibility paper, in that 3 fairness conditions, balance for the positive/negative class and well calibrated decisions only work in 2 regimes: Perfect prediction or equal base rates
Another point to keep in mind is that fairness and high impact is impossible to achieve both at the same time, and that continuous fighting is therefore guaranteed between those that aim for high impact and those that want fairness or equality.
Link below:
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-03-27/algorithms-unfair-racial-bias-math
Paper below:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3097983.3098095
Similarly, group fairness and individual fairness can’t both be achieved at the same time:
Paper below:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07236
Also another impossibility paper, in that 3 fairness conditions, balance for the positive/negative class and well calibrated decisions only work in 2 regimes: Perfect prediction or equal base rates
Paper below:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05807