My initial reaction is that it’s not terrible but not great either. It feels more like a business, or even a specific philanthropy. I’m also not sure it describes well what effective altruism is about (as much as you can describe anything in a name).
I would guess this is at least somewhat intentional, my guess is that some of the orgs under EV (most obviously CEA) want to identify with effective altruism, while others think the brand is too costly for them.
I would guess this is at least somewhat intentional, my guess is that some of the orgs under EV (most obviously CEA) want to identify with effective altruism, while others think the brand is too costly for them.