I think the main thing is their astonishing success. Like, whatever else anyone wants to say to Ămile, they are damn hard working and driven. Itâs just in their case they are driven by fear and pure hatred of EA.
Approximately ~every major news media piece critical of EA (or covering EA with a critical lens, which are basically the same thing over the last year and a half) seems to link to/âquote Ămile at some point as a reputable and credible report on EA.
Sure, those more familiar with EA might be able to see the hyperbole, but itâs not imo out there to imagine that Ămileâs immensely negative presentation of EA being picked out by major outlets has contributed to the fall of EAâs reputation over the last couple of years.
Like, I was wish we could âcollectively agree to make Ămile irrelevantâ, but EA canât do that unilaterally given the influence their[1] ideas and arguments have had. Those are going to have to be challenged or confronted sooner or later.
I think the main thing is their astonishing success. Like, whatever else anyone wants to say to Ămile, they are damn hard working and driven. Itâs just in their case they are driven by fear and pure hatred of EA.
Approximately ~every major news media piece critical of EA (or covering EA with a critical lens, which are basically the same thing over the last year and a half) seems to link to/âquote Ămile at some point as a reputable and credible report on EA.
Sure, those more familiar with EA might be able to see the hyperbole, but itâs not imo out there to imagine that Ămileâs immensely negative presentation of EA being picked out by major outlets has contributed to the fall of EAâs reputation over the last couple of years.
Like, I was wish we could âcollectively agree to make Ămile irrelevantâ, but EA canât do that unilaterally given the influence their[1] ideas and arguments have had. Those are going to have to be challenged or confronted sooner or later.
That is, Ămileâs