My instinctual response to this was: âwell it is not very helpful to admit someone for whom it would be great if they got into EA if they really seem like they wonâtâ.
However, since it seems like we are not particularly good at predicting whether they will get involved or not maybe this is a metric we should incorporate. (My intuition is that we would still want a baseline? There could be someone it would be absolutely amazing to have get involved but if they are extremely against EA ideas and disruptive that might lower the quality of the fellowship for others.)
I am not super confident, though, that we would be very good at predicting this anyways. Are there certain indicators of this that you would suggest? I am also really not sure how/âwhen we would collect feedback. Also open to thoughts here.
My instinctual response to this was: âwell it is not very helpful to admit someone for whom it would be great if they got into EA if they really seem like they wonâtâ.
However, since it seems like we are not particularly good at predicting whether they will get involved or not maybe this is a metric we should incorporate. (My intuition is that we would still want a baseline? There could be someone it would be absolutely amazing to have get involved but if they are extremely against EA ideas and disruptive that might lower the quality of the fellowship for others.)
I am not super confident, though, that we would be very good at predicting this anyways. Are there certain indicators of this that you would suggest? I am also really not sure how/âwhen we would collect feedback. Also open to thoughts here.