The Centre for Exploratory Altruism Research (CEARCH) estimated policy advocacy to increase resilience to global agricultural crises is 30 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities. I adjusted their estimate, and concluded it is 4.08 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
CEARCH estimated lobbying for nuclear arsenal limitation is 5 k times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities. I guess the actual cost-effectiveness is more like 10 times that of GiveWell’s top charities.
I estimated epidemic/pandemic preparedness is 24.3 % (= 1⁄4.12) as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
I think the best animal welfare interventions are way more cost-effective than the best in global health and development:
I estimated broiler welfare and cage-free campaigns are 168 and 462 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
I estimated the Shrimp Welfare Project is 64.3 k times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
Thanks for the question, Kaleem.
The Centre for Exploratory Altruism Research (CEARCH) estimated policy advocacy to increase resilience to global agricultural crises is 30 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities. I adjusted their estimate, and concluded it is 4.08 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
CEARCH estimated lobbying for nuclear arsenal limitation is 5 k times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities. I guess the actual cost-effectiveness is more like 10 times that of GiveWell’s top charities.
I estimated epidemic/pandemic preparedness is 24.3 % (= 1⁄4.12) as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
I think the best animal welfare interventions are way more cost-effective than the best in global health and development:
I estimated broiler welfare and cage-free campaigns are 168 and 462 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
I estimated the Shrimp Welfare Project is 64.3 k times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
Thank you !