You’re right that there are big differences. I’m inclined to agree that some asks should be an “easier sell” too. I’m wondering if you think that these differences notably affect the arguments of this post?
I think potentially they do, in terms of the typical playbook and framing for corporate campaigns being less relevant. As in, it’s less moral outrage vs. profit and appealing to corporations to be good, and more reckless endangerment vs. naive optimism and appealing to people at corporations (who presumably care about their own safety) to see sense. Morality/ethics doesn’t need to be a factor, assuming people care for their own lives and those of their family and friends.
You’re right that there are big differences. I’m inclined to agree that some asks should be an “easier sell” too. I’m wondering if you think that these differences notably affect the arguments of this post?
I think potentially they do, in terms of the typical playbook and framing for corporate campaigns being less relevant. As in, it’s less moral outrage vs. profit and appealing to corporations to be good, and more reckless endangerment vs. naive optimism and appealing to people at corporations (who presumably care about their own safety) to see sense. Morality/ethics doesn’t need to be a factor, assuming people care for their own lives and those of their family and friends.