I think a related question is:”How much less effective would a project have to be for it to be worth it in terms of possible effectiveness and training value?”ie Is it worth there being moonshot with lower EV than say GiveDirectly, which might find great leaders?
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I think a related question is:
”How much less effective would a project have to be for it to be worth it in terms of possible effectiveness and training value?”
ie Is it worth there being moonshot with lower EV than say GiveDirectly, which might find great leaders?