RSS

Time of perils

TagLast edit: 1 Oct 2022 20:13 UTC by Pablo

The time of perils is a hypothetical period in human history during which existential risk is unusually high. The time of perils hypothesis is the view that we are currently living in a time of perils.

Duration of the time of perils

Carl Shulman has argued that the time of perils will likely last only a few centuries because of various technological developments that are jointly expected to eventually bring down existential risk per century to very low levels. As Shulman writes,[1]

It’s quite likely the extinction/​existential catastrophe rate approaches zero within a few centuries if civilization survives, because:

  1. Riches and technology make us comprehensively immune to natural disasters.

  2. Cheap ubiquitous detection, barriers, and sterilization make civilization immune to biothreats

  3. Advanced tech makes neutral parties immune to the effects of nuclear winter.

  4. Local cheap production makes for small supply chains that can regrow from disruption as industry becomes more like information goods.

  5. Space colonization creates robustness against local disruption.

  6. Aligned AI blocks threats from misaligned AI (and many other things).

  7. Advanced technology enables stable policies (e.g. the same AI police systems enforce treaties banning WMD war for billions of years), and the world is likely to wind up in some stable situation (bouncing around until it does).

Further reading

MacAskill, William (2022) Are we living at the hinge of history?, in Jeff McMahan et al. (eds.) Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 331–357.

Related entries

hinge of history | existential security | vulnerable world hypothesis

  1. ^

    Shulman, Carl (2022) Comment on “The discount rate is not zero”, Effective Altruism Forum, September 2.

Ex­is­ten­tial risk pes­simism and the time of perils

David Thorstad12 Aug 2022 14:42 UTC
177 points
67 comments20 min readEA link

Are we liv­ing at the most in­fluen­tial time in his­tory?

William_MacAskill3 Sep 2019 4:55 UTC
204 points
147 comments24 min readEA link

How bad would hu­man ex­tinc­tion be?

arvomm23 Oct 2023 12:01 UTC
132 points
25 comments18 min readEA link

Chart­ing the precipice: The time of per­ils and pri­ori­tiz­ing x-risk

David Rhys Bernard24 Oct 2023 16:25 UTC
86 points
14 comments25 min readEA link

Carl Shul­man — En­vi­sion­ing a world im­mune to global catas­trophic biolog­i­cal risks

Pablo15 Oct 2020 13:19 UTC
70 points
0 comments6 min readEA link
(reflectivedisequilibrium.blogspot.com)

Causes and Uncer­tainty: Re­think­ing Value in Expectation

Bob Fischer11 Oct 2023 9:15 UTC
219 points
29 comments15 min readEA link

Space set­tle­ment and the time of per­ils: a cri­tique of Thorstad

Matthew Rendall14 Apr 2024 15:29 UTC
40 points
10 comments4 min readEA link

Re­port on the De­sir­a­bil­ity of Science Given New Biotech Risks

Matt Clancy17 Jan 2024 19:42 UTC
78 points
23 comments4 min readEA link

[Creative Non­fic­tion] The Toba Su­per­vol­canic Eruption

Jackson Wagner29 Oct 2021 17:02 UTC
55 points
3 comments6 min readEA link

Cy­borg Pe­ri­ods: There will be mul­ti­ple AI transitions

Jan_Kulveit22 Feb 2023 16:09 UTC
68 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Pod­cast In­ter­view with David Thorstad on Ex­is­ten­tial Risk, The Time of Per­ils, and Billion­aire Philanthropy

Nick_Anyos4 Jun 2023 8:52 UTC
38 points
0 comments1 min readEA link
(critiquesofea.podbean.com)
No comments.