Hi there Larks, our position is that a functional, less-divided government that can actually enact policy is critical infrastructure for advancing many high-impact goals. A system that reduces partisan gridlock and toxic rivalry (as Approval Voting aims to do) can lead to more stable, long-term policy that is essential for complex issues like pandemic preparedness, climate change mitigation, or global health security. These problems require years of consistent effort, not policy reversals with every election cycle. When political energy is spent on partisan warfare, like we’re seeing, the focus shifts from evidence-based solutions to scoring political points. A system rewarding consensus may encourage legislators to focus on what works rather than who wins. Regardless of a policy’s popularity, a government paralyzed by division often lacks the political capacity to take meaningful action, even on issues where voters do agree. Improving the mechanism of governance is about enabling the system to serve the collective good with competence and speed. Ultimately, a political system that prioritizes cooperation and competence over extremism gives EA advocates a stronger platform to champion high-leverage policies and allocate resources effectively. It’s about building a better engine for positive change. We wanted our post to invite conversation, so I am glad to see you jump in with your thoughts. Thank you.
Hi there Larks, our position is that a functional, less-divided government that can actually enact policy is critical infrastructure for advancing many high-impact goals. A system that reduces partisan gridlock and toxic rivalry (as Approval Voting aims to do) can lead to more stable, long-term policy that is essential for complex issues like pandemic preparedness, climate change mitigation, or global health security. These problems require years of consistent effort, not policy reversals with every election cycle. When political energy is spent on partisan warfare, like we’re seeing, the focus shifts from evidence-based solutions to scoring political points. A system rewarding consensus may encourage legislators to focus on what works rather than who wins. Regardless of a policy’s popularity, a government paralyzed by division often lacks the political capacity to take meaningful action, even on issues where voters do agree. Improving the mechanism of governance is about enabling the system to serve the collective good with competence and speed. Ultimately, a political system that prioritizes cooperation and competence over extremism gives EA advocates a stronger platform to champion high-leverage policies and allocate resources effectively. It’s about building a better engine for positive change. We wanted our post to invite conversation, so I am glad to see you jump in with your thoughts. Thank you.