Are there currently any posters/brochures for EA, Givewell, GWWC etc.?
Edit: thanks guys, glad to know these exist. Will probably print a few to dot around my university.
Are there currently any posters/brochures for EA, Givewell, GWWC etc.?
Edit: thanks guys, glad to know these exist. Will probably print a few to dot around my university.
Great job getting something up for this guys. If we wanted to improve it for next year, I’d suggest interspersing some footage of the work being done and putting key points like the cost to deworm a kid, the amount that’ve been helped and the benefits of deworming right at the start of the video (literally in the first 20 seconds if possible) and in text overlay so everyone sees them (a lot of people I’ve talked to who have watched P4A vids only watch the very start of them). Since it’s a yearly thing the time investment now could pay off, and starting with those big facts to grab attention then winding into an introduction of where the research comes from and more description could work well.
Also, does anyone know how many of the top voted charities the money gets split between? Is it the top three, or top ten, or...? And how it’s split (proportional to votes or equally)?
I see the hero as the one pushing innovative new strategies for world-changing (eg. starting a business in that area, like Givewell—specifics subject to what changes the hero wants to make), while the sidekicks are the ones that help out by being employed in that business (in a non-directing role) or donating to it or providing moral support etc. - they help what’s already been created do better, and thus have to choose from people/causes that already exist rather than creating their own.
What type of arts do you enjoy? For instance, I always really enjoyed English and drama, and am now in a data science job where I am going to be writing up publications and doing talks in addition to my coding/stats work. If you go for a small or start-up company, you can often have a broader job like this where you can take on tasks that interest you—my perception is that larger companies tend to have more regimented roles.
If you’re more into visual arts, web design, marketing or some sort of community-building/social logistics could be good options. They’d also provide good skills in short supply to volunteer to the EA community.
It’s a good point, there’s often cases for discounting in a lot of decisions where we’re weighing up value. It’s usually done for two reasons – one being uncertainty, so we’re less certain of stuff in the future and therefore our actions might not do what we expect or the reward we’re hoping for might not actually happen. And the second being only relevant to financial stuff, but given inflation – and that you’re likely to have more income the older you are—the money’s real value is more now than later.
The second reason doesn’t really apply here because happiness doesn’t decrease in value as you go through generations, like your happiness doesn’t matter less than your parents or grandparents did, even though $5 now means less than $5 then. The first reason is interesting because there is a lot of uncertainty in the future. And for some of our actions this means we should discount their expected effects, like they might not do what we expect, but that doesn’t mean the people itself are of less value – just that we’re not as sure how to help them. I think the actions we can be most sure of helping them are things that reduce risks in the short-term future, because if everything goes to crap or we all die that’s pretty sure to be negative for them. But uncertainty on the people themselves would look like – ‘I know how to help these guys, but I’m not sure I want to, like I’m not sure they’ll be people worth helping’. Personally I think I might care about them more, given every generation so far has had advances in the way they treat others, I like you already but I reckon I might like us even better if we’d grown up 5000 years from now!
Thanks for the feedback!
having this available as a podcast (read by a human) would be cool
That would be awesome—I don’t have time to make one myself, but if anyone else wants to take the post and make it into something like that feel free.
this sentence is confusing to me: “Due to this, he concludes the cause area is one of the most important LT problems and primarily advises focusing on other risks due to neglectedness.”—is it missing a “not”?
Good point—I’ve re-read the conclusion and changed that line to be a bit clearer. It now reads: “Due to this, he concludes that climate change is still an important LT area—though not as important as some other global catastrophic risks (eg. biorisk), which outsize on both neglectedness and scale.”
Awesome, glad to hear :-)
Ah good point—that’s one I decided partway not to summarize but forgot to move it out of the section.
Ah yep, good idea—I’ll do that for next week’s :)
Thanks! Fixed
Great to hear, and thanks for the clarification.
That’s great to hear, thank you :)
Ah cheers, that makes sense—I’ll update in the forum summary post too.
Post summary (feel free to suggest edits!):
Differing values creates risks of uncooperative behavior within the EA community, such as failing to update on good arguments because they come from the “other side”, failing to achieve common moral aims (eg. avoiding worst case outcomes), failing to compromise, or committing harmful acts out of spite / tribalism.
The author suggests mitigating these risks by assuming good intent, looking for positive-sum compromises, actively noticing and reducing our tendency to promote / like our ingroup more, and validating that the situation is challenging and it’s normal to feel some tension.
(If you’d like to see more summaries of top EA and LW forum posts, check out the Weekly Summaries series.)
Awesome, thanks for doing this!
Post summary (feel free to suggest edits):
Around 250 people on the UK kidney waiting list die each year. Donating your kidney via the UK Living Kidney Sharing Scheme can potentially kick off altruistic chains of donor-recipient pairs ie. multiple donations. Donor and recipient details are kept confidential.
The process is ~12-18 months and involves consultations, tests, surgery, and for the author 3 days of hospital recovery. In a week since discharge, most problems have cleared up, they can slowly walk several miles, and they encountered no serious complications.
(If you’d like to see more summaries of top EA and LW forum posts, check out the Weekly Summaries series.)
Post summary (feel free to suggest edits!):
Highlights for ALLFED in 2022 include:
Submitted 4 papers to peer review (some now published)
Started to develop country-level preparedness and response plans for Abrupt Sunlight Reduction Scenarios (US plan completed).
Worked on financial mechanisms for food system interventions, including superpests, climate food finance nexus, and pandemic preparedness.
Delivered briefings to several NATO governments and UN agencies on global food security, nuclear winter impacts, policy considerations and resilience options.
Appeared in major media outlets such as BBC Future and The Times.
Improved internal operations, including registering as a 501(c)(3) non-profit.
Delivered 20+ presentations and attended 30+ workshops / events / conferences.
Hired 6 research associates, 4 operations roles, 5 interns, and 42 volunteers.
ALLFED is funding constrained and gratefully appreciates any donations. The heightened geopolitical tensions from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict create a time-limited policy window for bringing their research on food system preparedness to the forefront of decision makers’ minds.
(If you’d like to see more summaries of top EA and LW forum posts, check out the Weekly Summaries series.)
Post summary (feel free to suggest edits!):
There is a paid opportunity to be part of a Malaria vaccine trial in Baltimore from January to early March. The vaccine has a solid chance of being deployed for pregnant women if it passes this challenge trial. It’s ~55 hours time commitment if in Baltimore or more if needing to travel, and the risk of serious complications is very low. The author signed up, and knows 6 others who have expressed serious interest. Get in touch with questions or to join an AirBnB the author is setting up for it.
(If you’d like to see more summaries of top EA and LW forum posts, check out the Weekly Summaries series.)
Post summary (feel free to suggest edits!):
The author’s observations from talking to / offering advice to several EA orgs:
Many orgs skew heavily junior, and most managers and managers-of-managers are in that role for the first time.
Many leaders are isolated (no peers to check in with) and / or reluctant (would prefer not to do people management).
They suggest solutions of:
Creating an EA manager’s slack (let them know if you’re interested!)
Non-EA management/leadership coaches—they haven’t found most questions they get in their coaching are EA-specific.
More orgs hire a COO to take over people management from whoever does the vision / strategy / fundraising.
More orgs consider splitting management roles into separate people management and technical leadership roles.
(If you’d like to see more summaries of top EA and LW forum posts, check out the Weekly Summaries series.)
Post summary (feel free to suggest edits!):
Linkpost and key excerpts from a New Yorker article overviewing how EA has reacted to SBF and the FTX collapse. The article claims there was an internal slack channel of EA leaders where a warning that SBF “has a reputation [in some circles] as someone who regularly breaks laws to make money” was shared, before the collapse.
(If you’d like to see more summaries of top EA and LW forum posts, check out the Weekly Summaries series.)
Post summary (feel free to suggest edits!):
Linkpost to an article by Rohit Krishnan, a former hedge fund manager. Haydn highlights key excerpts, including one claiming that “This isn’t Enron, where you had extremely smart folk hide beautifully constructed fictions in their publicly released financial statements. This is Dumb Enron, where someone “trust me bro”-ed their way to a $32 Billion valuation.”
They mention that “the list of investors in FTX [was] a who’s who of the investing world” and while “VCs don’t really do forensic accounting” there were still plenty of red flags they should have checked. Eg. basics like if FTX had an accountant, management team, back office, board, lent money to the CEO, or how intertwined FTX and Alameda were. The author has had investments 1/10th the size of what some major investors had in FTX, and still required a company audit, with most of these questions taking “half an hour max”.
(If you’d like to see more summaries of top EA and LW forum posts, check out the Weekly Summaries series.)
I donated a couple hundred dollars to GiveDirectly myself, my brother donated another $75 for my birthday, and have taken up the idea of a charity jar from LessWrong a month or so ago (putting money in it every time I need an emotional boost or turn down donating to collectors on the street/donating to projects like HabitRPG) - at the end of the year it’s all going to an as-yet-undecided effective charity.
I also wrote my final psyc assignment (where we can research anything related to judgement and decision-making and do a write-up or pilot study) on the charitable giving process, how people choose charities, and how we can make it more effective. Probably not new ground covered for EAs but I might post it. I discussed this a lot with friends and tutors, so hopefully that’ll make some of them interested in EA too—I’ve had at least a few ask more about Givewell and look it up.