Hi all! I just graduated with a master’s in public policy and as a Gleitsman Fellow from Harvard University. I am based in DC working as US Policy Specialist, engagi with different facets of the US Government on AI policy and risks from other technologies.
I have worked at Council on Foreign Relations for Global Health and Nuclear Threat Initiative on biosecurity. I was also a Fellow at Cambridge Existential Risk Institute and Swiss Existential Risk Institute.
I graduated with undergraduate and postgraduate degrees in International Policy from the London School of Economics. I have interests in catastrophic biological risks, global governance, AI, and international security. I have published co-authored work in Foreign Affairs, the Lancet, the UN, and other platforms.
Hi Ben, that’s very helpful! It is hard finding a category scheme that captures the distinction perfectly. One scheme Ive been debating since I read your comment is “convergence by technology” and “convergence by risk environment”. It has its issues, but in my mind it gets closest to what I am trying to capture in the term(s). Very interested in more suggestions/further thoughts!