Here since September 2024. As of recent Iām mostly into the intersection of AI safety and animal welfare.
Joanna Michalska š¹
Karma: 141
I think it could be beneficial to diversify the arguments by adding a note on the impact on environment and the costs of insect mealāeven if the argument on insect sentience is accepted it may be deemed not important (factory farming has a track record of this). Hereās what my colleague Keyvan Mostafavi wrote in addition to the animal welfare arguments:
āOne of the main issues with insect meal is its cost. It is currently 2 to 10 times more expensive than conventional feed options like soybean or fish meal (Leipertz et al., 2024; World Bank). Additionally, insect farming was initially promoted as an environmentally friendly solution. However, studies challenge these claims (ThĆ©venot and all, Mealworm meal for animal feed: Environmental assessment and sensitivity analysis to guide future prospects). Insect farms often rely on cereal-based feed, competing with traditional agriculture rather than utilizing food waste as originally intended. This reduces their sustainability benefits and, in some cases, increases their environmental impact. (...)ā
Consider adding these to the post if you find them useful.
Can people who arenāt UK citizens vote too?
I donāt know how ethical it is compared to zero, but compared to the most likely counterfactual (some other person, not aligned with EA and less concerned about AI risks getting this job) I think itās better if you do it.
I do get the concern about the EA forum being very serious. I myself find it intimidating to write here and very much share the sentiment of Olivia Addyās great post.
At the same time, I donāt think the culture here should change.In defense of gatekeeping:
There are already EA communities that are more casualāon Reddit, Twitter, Facebook and Slack. The forum presents a unique niche.
I assume most people lurking the forum are more on the casual side (pulling it from general internet user base rates?). Iād worry that less-serious posts would get more engagement for the virtue of being less-serious and more accessible to people new to EA, while more sophisticated posts would be drowned out.
Iām not sure if you can stop the culture shift when it starts (see: Thresholdingāby Duncan SabienāHomo Sabiens). And when it changes enough, the people who were initially the most engaged stop posting.
Anecdotal examples from my n=1:
A Discord server for negative utilitariansāI once went through all messages spanning a few years (donāt ask me why) and saw the shift from a discussion not too different from the EA forum, through gradual casualization to the current state where itās mostly young people discussing suicide and venting about their arguments with ābreedersā. The people who engaged with the server in the beginning, when it was EAforum-like, have completely stopped posting.
Another Discord server I was in went through the same shiftāsome people joined the server and gradually shifted the culture towards something resembling Twitter. They werenāt doing anything bad enough to be banned (thresholding problem again), but dominated the discussion and made the veterans leave. In the end, the server got closed by the admin, citing the culture shift.
Exactly the same happened to a fairly large Facebook group I was in. It got closed down as well.
I observed that as subreddits grow, the culture undergoes the same shift. It takes a few people to start posting less thought-through content ā the silent majority of casual lurkers upvotes these posts into the frontpage ā people see that and start posting more of this kind of content ā veterans leave, because itās not the same space anymore.
It may look this way, but I have nothing against casual communities. In fact, in the majority of communities Iām in I am the casual lurker upvoting the memes and skipping over dissertations. I think both kinds of spaces are needed, itās just that the more niche ones need some curation/āprotection.
Maybe putting a link to the EA Anywhere Slack somewhere visible would be a good idea? I only learned about its existence at the recent EAG, and I think itās the kind of space that a lot of people here are after.
During the EA forum voting week I did some research into the orgs that were listed and I was impressed by RPās detailed doc on what theyād use the funding for; I hadnāt been aware of the work youāre doing in the field of animal welfare. I care for invertebrate welfare as both the scale and neglectedness of the problem are enormous, so the projects listed got me excited.
Keep up the great work!
This year I started montlhly donations to ACE recommended charities fund and Anima International + made some individual donations to THL, Hive and others. Iāll be switching to Rethink Priorities in the new year.
I think offsetting your emissions and offsetting your meat consumption are treated differently by EAs because they really are different.
I liked the two examples presented by William MacAskill in āDoing good betterā:
Offsetting your contribution to climate change by donating to CoolEarth, so that all the CO2 you produce gets offset before it gets to harm anyoneāthe āundoing harmā kind
Donating to an org that advocates for not cheating on your spouse to offset your cheating on your spouseāthe āapologyā kind
In the second case the damage is already done; by offsetting, you just prevent further harm. Eating meat while donating to animal welfare organizations is more like the second example. You harm some animals and then pay for some other animals to be saved. You canāt undo the harm done to the animals harmed.
PART 1
-
The lives of the 100 people living today arenāt worth 10x more than the lives of the thousands living in the future, so I wouldnāt bury the waste.
-
I would have still donated; I donāt see much of a difference, and the time when the beneficiaries are alive isnāt a morally significant factor.
PART 2 My judgement is terrible but my confidence is very low so letās hope they cancel out.
-
-
The causes I feel are the most important are factory farming, wild animal suffering and S-risks (these, I believe, cause or have the potential to cause the most suffering while being hugely neglected).
-
Key uncertainty: The tractability of working on wild animal suffering seems to be a huge problem.
-
What to do about the uncertainty: Read up on what is already being done (Arthropoda foundation, Wild Animal Initiative) and what the prospects are.
-
Aptitudes to explore: community building, organization running/āboosting, supporting roles.
-
Keep volunteering for an effective organization while also recruiting new people into EA in free time; learn how to communicate ideas better.
-
Iām donating monthly to effective charities, volunteering my skills and engaging with the community.
-
My criticisms about EA:
As a negative utilitarian Iām bitter about all the X-risk prevention enthusiasts trying to stop me from pushing the big red button
Jokes asideāI got very excited about EA when I learned about it. At some point I became aware of the excitement and I had a concern pop up that it sounds too good to be true, almost like a cult. I consider myself rather impressionable/āeasy to manipulate so I learned that when I feel very hyped about something it should make me healthily suspicious.
Iām grateful for the article earlier in the chapter that presented some good faith criticism and I agree with some of its points
Some thoughts:
EA may feel alienating to people who arenāt top-of-their-field 150iq professionals. I very much relate to this post: https://āāforum.effectivealtruism.org/āāposts/āāx9Rn5SfapcbbZaZy9/āāea-for-dumb-people . Maybe itās for the better and results in higher talent density and better reputation for the movement, maybe weāre missing out on some skilled people/āāpotential donors or critical mass.
Iād love to see some statistics on why people leave the movement, and what the rate is. I suspect that moral perfectionism leading to self-neglect and burnout is an occupational hazard among EAs (like it is among animal advocates).
Itās somewhat difficult to talk about EA to regular people. Look, thereās this movement that can literally save the world from apocalypse (cultish), and we also believe that shrimp welfare is important (insane). On the other hand, maybe I shouldnāt start my conversations like that.
I may be mistaken, but I think the author was referring to positive beliefs (as opposed to normative beliefs), in which case your points 1 and 2 would be addressed. Itās not made clear in this article but thatās what I believe based on the context I first read this essay in (a series of blog posts collected in the book āMap and Territoryā), which was more about seeking truth than doing good.
There seems to be a mistake, the link at the beginning leads to the nuclear weapons problem profile.
After some reading I moved my votes around slightly as I canāt rationally justify not giving more weight to potential invertebrate suffering + these causes likely wonāt attract too many philanthropists from outside EA.
I still need to do more research so my votes will probably change, but Iām generally focusing on what I think are ongoing, large scale moral catastrophesāie. factory farming and wild animal suffering.
Hi everyone! Iām Joanna, 25 year old from Poland. My main EA interests are factory farming, wild animal suffering and s-risks.
Iāve been thinking of myself as a negative utilitarian for a long time, but the extent of my contribution was being a silent, resigned vegan. I hit rock bottom in September this year after reaching a conclusion that my life is probably a net negative for the world and that I unwittingly cause more suffering than my life is worth. I got support from a community built around David Pearceās āHedonistic Imperativeā and thatās how I learned about EA, so I guess you could say it saved my life.
Since then Iāve been volunteering for Anima International and offering skilled volunteering for other EA-aligned animal advocacy orgs as a graphic designer (feel free to contact me if you need some graphic design done!)
Iām also trying to decide what to do with my 80.000-n hours, but the more I read the less certain I am (and there wasnāt much certainty to begin with). Iāve worked as a senior artist for the gamedev industry, so my skillset is pretty narrow and mostly redundant due to AI. So far Iāve finished some courses (mainly on effective animal advocacy and nonprofit work) and Iām now learning data science, economics and biology.
Giving status: monthly donations to ACE and Otwarte Klatki (Anima International); planning to take the GWWC pledge when I have stable income (Iām currently freelancing and in the process of transitioning to a more impactful career path)degree of initiation into EA: Iām currently halfway through the EA Handbook and 3ā4 through the 80.000 Hours career planning course; Iāve read āDoing Good Betterā, ā80.000 Hoursā, āMap and Territoryā, āHedonistic Imperativeā, āThinking, fast and slowā, āFamine, affluence and moralityā; started reading āAnimal Liberation Nowā, but it was too brutal. I also finished AACās effective animal advocacy course.
Favourite EA forum post: on the fence between https://āāforum.effectivealtruism.org/āāposts/āāDtr8aHqCQSDhyueFZ/āāthe-possibility-of-an-ongoing-moral-catastrophe-summary and https://āāforum.effectivealtruism.org/āāposts/āāRZEvk6cBtBg2mpgwS/āātrigger-warning-violence-animal-vs-human-welfare-sharingFavourite EA book: āDoing Good Betterā, (or, if I can go a bit wider, āMap and Territoryā)
What I can offer: volunteering as a graphic designer, Iām also pretty good at tedious labour (like data cleanup) in google sheets.
Hoping to: get more clarity regarding career path and building skills useful for the movement.
Interests outside EA: metalearning, PKMs, productivity, psychology, art (the practical side of it)
Glad to be here!
Part A
Math + surface level considerations based on the information in the links (Iām new here):
Hellen Keller International
- lives saved: 23
- vitamin A supplements administered: 79 977
- evidence of impact: strong
- has room for more fundingMalaria Consortium
- lives saved: 16
- children seasonally protected from malaria: 11 425
- evidence of impact: exceptionally strong
- has room for more fundingAgainst Malaria Foundation
- lives saved: 14,5
- anti-malaria nets purchased: 15 995
- iirc the nets last for ~3 years (probably taken into account by GL already)
- itās a well-known charity within the EA community (to the point itās become a meme) so I cautiously assume it gets more funding than the others/āis somewhat less neglected
- added factor of insect suffering? (how much suffering does dying from insecticides generate vs the alternatives)New Incentives
- lives saved: 16
- children vaccinated: 500
- I assume the effects are long-lasting, so even if HKI or MC interventions are cheaper per person, NI vaccinations could be more effective when compared one to one (?)
- evidence of impact: strongPart B
Iām hesitating between HKI and NI, so Iāll use the numbers to break the tie/āas a correction for my scope neglect and go with Hellen Keller International (they also stated they have more room for funding)
Part C
- impact of different career paths Iām considering
- I need to finally do an evaluation of the most effective food so I can just buy beans or legumes in bulk and not make calculations every time Iām grocery shopping
- impact of learning/āself-development vs what else I could be doing in this time
There are more sentient beings affected by factory farming and the problem is more neglected.
The best April Fools post Iāve read today.