I am a strategist and founder with 20+ years of experience in communications, marketing, operations, civic infrastructure building, and systems-level storytelling. Based in Washington, DC, I came to AI safety through an unconventional path, not via a traditional pipeline, but through two decades of building institutional trust in communities that AI governance has never seriously tried to reach.
Karen Maria Alston
Karma: 21
Introducing Hokmah: The Comprehension Gap Is a Power Concentration Problem, Not a Communication Failure.
Thank you for articulating something that many of us who would be considered “generalists” have experienced while trying to transition into AI safety. My path has been remarkably similar and like you, I became concerned about the societal implications of advanced AI, invested significant time in learning the field, sought guidance from people already in the ecosystem, and worked to demonstrate both commitment and alignment.
What stands out to me is the amount of persistence required simply to reach the starting line. I have watched talented professionals spend months learning, networking, volunteering, and repositioning themselves, only to become discouraged by the pace of the transition and ultimately leave for opportunities in other sectors.
That loss is not small and it’s measurable. Every person who exits the field represents a loss of accumulated knowledge, motivation, and some domain expertise. These are often people with years or decades of experience in communications, operations, design, marketing, fundraising, community building, product development, or program management all skills that many organizations say they need but that are difficult to signal through traditional AI safety pathways.
One question I continue to wrestle with is whether the current system is unintentionally selecting for people who can afford extended periods of uncertainty rather than those who can make the greatest contribution. Volunteer work, public writing, networking, and continuous self-education may be reasonable signals of commitment, but they also create barriers that disproportionately affect experienced professionals with financial obligations and established careers. (One of my career mentors is leaving the field due to family obligations and a need to earn income. Her leaving the field is a tremendous loss.) I also share some skepticism about the widespread advice to “write publicly.” For some roles, particularly research, policy, and communications, public writing is a strong signal. For many operational and execution-oriented roles, however, the strongest evidence of capability is often the work itself. We should be careful not to assume that every valuable contributor needs to become a public intellectual.
I remain optimistic about the field and grateful for the people who have offered guidance along the way.
It’s extremely intimidating to write in the EAForum. Normally I write my thoughts and ask Google or Claude to edit for mistakes or clarity.
This is such an important conversation that I am living through now. I wanted to add not detract from the conversation. I will go back to lurking on the EA Forum.
Agustin,
That’s a helpful distinction and honestly it sharpens my thinking. If the roles are out there, then the real gap isn’t that people can’t find the door, it’s that most people don’t yet have what it takes to walk through it or understand the pathway to get there.
That’s the part I was really trying to name. Someone who genuinely cares about this work but can’t yet meet the bar for an AI safety role isn’t going to wait around. They’re going to take the governance, policy, or corporate “ai ethics” job that’s hiring right now because that path exists and this one is harder to navigate. By the time the ecosystem builds the infrastructure to develop that person, it’s already lost them.
So I’ll refine what I said: the front door may be more visible than I implied. The pathway to being ready to walk through it is what’s missing.
What you and your colleagues are building with the Generator Residency is exactly the kind of infrastructure this ecosystem needs. Creating a structured pathway that develops, credentials, and places generalists is the missing piece. I’m excited to see it and share it with my cohort team members.
I’ll add one more data point from where I’m sitting right now. In my CEA bootcamp cohort there are several talented, mission-aligned generalists actively searching for roles in AI safety organizations. The consistent challenge isn’t motivation or alignment, it’s access. Without a technical background, breaking into this ecosystem often comes down to who you know or who referred you.
I hope the Generator Residency is the first of many programs like it. The talent is out there and it is mission aligned.
Pipelines don’t just fail by being absent they lose talent by being outcompeted. Right now, policy organizations, governance think tanks and for profit businesses are winning the generalist talent competition by default, simply because they have job listings, defined roles, and an onboarding infrastructure. AI safety and impact organizations have tremendous potential and a broken front door and that asymmetry has a cost that compounds quietly.
The post identifies a real bottleneck, but I don’t think this risk gets named or measured sharply enough in the ecosystem. The field isn’t just failing to attract generalist talent, it’s actively losing those who are aligned and passionate about working to adjacent pipelines that have clearer entry points.
Policy organizations, governance think tanks, and corporate AI teams are hiring. They post on LinkedIn and Indeed. Some add the term “ethics or safety” to the job title. They have defined roles, recognizable credentials, and onboarding infrastructure. For someone with strong mission alignment but no research or technical background, “AI safety-adjacent” becomes the path of least resistance. The person has the conviction, but easier and legible paths exist that are nuanced and harder to identify in the AI safety space.
The counterfactual isn’t that person staying in marketing. It’s that person doing meaningful work on AI, outside the ecosystem, in structures that don’t share the same stakes or threat models and that is a compounding loss.
I’m raising this from inside of the problem as I’m a strategic communications executive, with 20+ years of experience and a non-technical background. I found AI safety last August through the standard rabbit hole that began with a YouTube talk by Tristan Harris, AI 2027, BlueDot, 80,000 Hours, Successif, and now the CEA Career Bootcamp. As of this writing I’m asking my bootcamp advisor for referrals to people who’ve made this pivot from generalist or strategic communications to AI safety organization. From networking and taking courses I respond to every job or connection. I show up to events where I’m often the eldest person in the room and routinely the only one without a research or technical background.
EA members tell me the ecosystem needs communicators and generalists. As the writers suggest searching the 80000 Hours job listings or fellowship opportunities it’s hard to see the need for those of us with these skills. The credentialing infrastructure or pathway doesn’t exist outside of Blue Dot or the CEA Bootcamp. There is an implicit hierarchy where research is the real work and it is legible even when it’s unintentional. I have enough context and drive to push through that friction but I shouldn’t have to rely on referrals and my tenacity.
The Generator Residency is a meaningful signal and I plan to apply. But the deeper fix is making the pipeline visible enough that alignment-minded generalists don’t have to stumble into AI safety and sturdy enough that they don’t get routed elsewhere while they’re looking for the door.
Credit to the authors for naming this clearly. The Generator Residency is a good first move and the pipeline problem is bigger than one program and worth continued pressure.
Congratulations @gergo! Having had the pleasure of connecting with you already, I can say with confidence that EA UK is in very good hands. Wishing you a strong and exciting start in this new role.
This post speaks directly to where I am right now and I truly enjoy your content. I am pivoting careers which is, honestly, a scary place to be. So, I keep showing up to EA events such as happy hours and women’s gatherings. I am usually the oldest person in the room, which isn’t always easy. However it is starting to pay off.
I attended an EA Women’s event recently, met someone and within a week she had already opened two doors for me. I didn’t plan on that and I am still working on describing what role I want to play in the AI Safety space. However, I am glad I attended that event.
A few months ago, at an EA Happy Hour I met someone in the same generation as me, also searching, pivoting careers and trying to figure it out. We now share resources and support each other and yes, joke that we are always the elders in the room. That connection alone has made the journey feel less lonely and I have someone I can reach out to and find community.
Sofia’s framework captures something I’m living in real time. The layers and serendipity are real. I am learning greater patience and believe in the power of compounding. I am looking forward to the day I can stop saying I’m pivoting and finally say I’ve arrived. Until then, I’ll keep showing up.
This post was recommended to me by a friend in EA and I was pleasantly surprised to see you were the author. Such great advice and guidance for those of us searching for jobs in the EA space. Thank you for the tips and the section on imposter syndrome. I am going to listen to the 80000 hours podcast on mental health. The journey to being hired is a deliberate practice and I am determined to find a role.
Thank you!
I love this post and the concept of “surface area for serendipity!” I believe in the power of serendipity and creating opportunity by stepping out and adding to your network. I am new to the EA community and learning to how to engage, be present and add value. This post is a helpful guide for newcomers. I hope to update this post in a few months with first hand knowledge of the guidance that you offer to assist in finding a job.
Thank you!
Hello everyone
I’m Karen Maria and I am based in Washington, DC in the USA. I was introduced to effective altruism through my 80,000 Hours coach, and I’m still orienting myself within the community.
I’ll be honest, the EA Forum can feel overwhelming and intimidating at times. There’s a level of rigor here that I deeply respect, and I’m currently more of a reader and lurker but I do plan to post and be a contributor. I’m learning how to sit with ideas, follow arguments carefully, and build understanding before I form strong views.
I’m making a late career pivot into AI safety and governance. I come from a background in marketing, communications, stakeholder engagement and brand strategy. Over the past year my curiosity about AI tools turned into deeper concern about societal impact, power concentration, persuasion, and who is most vulnerable as these systems advance. I am currently working on my theory of change.
Most of my downtime now is spent studying. I’m reading research papers, policy analysis, and watching lots of podcasts, often slowly and repeatedly, to build real comprehension rather than surface familiarity. This transition is intentional and, at times, uncomfortable, but it’s necessary.
I’d love recommendations from this community:
Articles or papers that will help me build foundational understanding
Writers or researchers worth following closely
Posts on the Forum that you think are especially clarifying for someone earlier in the journey
I’m here because I value the norms this community upholds: intellectual honesty, seriousness about impact, and humility in the face of uncertainty. I’m grateful to learn from those further along the path and to be part of the conversation as I continue to grow into this work.
Karen Maria
This was a great post and thank you for sharing the concepts of context and creating opportunities for serendipity. I am new to the EA community and this advice is excellent. Thank you!
Thank you! I appreciate the feedback and guidance.
Thanks for sharing this update, your theory of change, and being transparent on where Amplify is now and where you are headed. I am glad to see someone taking marketing seriously within the EA Safety ecosystem. Too often, strong ideas stall not because they lack the ideas but they lack the reach. Wishing you momentum as you scale and navigate the next phase.
Karen Maria
A year ago, I would have never considered a role in AI Safety. I too fell down the rabbit hole by reading AI 2027, taking courses and now am completely focused on finding a role in the AI Safety community. I am a women, experienced professional in my 50s and my life has changed over the past 3 months. This essay is great advice, to be in this industry you need context, a deep understanding of the landscape and nuance. I am happy to be a student and to learn and am realizing it may take me 6 − 12 months to find a job. Thank you for this roadmap and guidance.
Great to see you here too. I am hopeful that I will find the opportunity that allows me to have impact and utilize my skills.