My actual name is Patrick. Locke is me playing on https://xkcd.com/635/
My dog’s name is Scout. Yes that’s a daily reminder to maintain a Scout rather than Soldier’s mindset. A bit of backstory: Out of grad school, several friends and I launched a public data nonprofit, with seed funding from the Knight Foundation and a coalition of visionary water managers that believed in our vision of public data infrastructure. You can learn more about our water data work at theCaDC.org.
Any updates on this cause area in light of, uh, recent developments?
Edge Esmeralda seems like a great bottom up experiment in a nontrivially better way of living together: https://www.edgeesmeralda.com/
A marginal rather than transformative revolution if you will.
The religious iconography in this post tickles me :)
Yes in a purely rational world :P
I wonder with these types of meta-analyses of relatively squishy subjects like “happiness” whether all the studies are in fact truly measuring the same outcome variable, as well as the same inputs. Man is not a machine, least of all the “crooked timber” of the mind.
Is there an EA subgroup focused on philosophical pragmatism? EA has a strong utilitarian image. There’s a lot more nuance though one problem with utilitarianism is that if the ends justify the means, then sufficiently impactful ends can justify any means—even very problematic issues like the recent SBF revelations.
Philosophical pragmatism offers a lot of insight for the EA movement. That would see ends and the cost benefit calcs that are beloved around here as one important though not all encompassing factor in decision-making.
Anyone work at GiveWell? I was somewhat intrigued by the new senior researcher position though curious to learn more about the direction of the organization. Specifically, I’d be curious into how deep GiveWell is open to looking into state capacity issues. I saw the relatively recent jpal work and curious if they’d be open to doing more of that work.
https://www.givewell.org/about/jobs/senior-researcher
I’d be happy to help however I can :)
“In response to a comment that “multiple friends who applied to the Pareto Fellowship felt like it was quite unprofessionally run” CEA staff reiterated that an evaluation was “forthcoming”, but it was never published.”
...
How do EA anchor institutions plan to operationalize changes based on these critiques? There seems to be a bit of a pattern in some that I’ve read where people point out problems and then nothing changes.
Was and is there going to be any accountability for the cultish aspects of things like the Pareto fellowship? That sounds absolutely bizarre.
Is there any explicit path for integrating criticism from the contest? I.e. are folks at some of the EA anchor organizations planning to read the essays and discuss operational changes in the aftermath?
Great post! Have any specific changes come about as a result of writing this? I’m always curious to better understand the feedback loop between dialogue on the forum and actions in the movement.
I particularly like the points about how EA can be too totalizing and think the movement could benefit from a more pragmatic streak, both with more practical minded professionally experienced people and also honestly more engagement with the pragmatist school of philosophical thought. (Everything seems to be pretty much implicitly consequentialist all the time around here.) I also wonder why can’t there be explicitly space for loose and half joined EA’s: “she got the sense that EA was a bit totalising, like she couldn’t really half-join”
Here’s a bit I wrote on the need for a more open and ecumenical EA movement: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NR2Y2B8Y4Wxn8pAS8/towards-a-more-ecumenical-ea-movement
Ah fair enough. That’s definitely a good reason. FWIW as someone long time EA adjacent but more newly active some of the questions in the application feel more like proving one’s fidelity to the EA cause rather than generally screening for problematic people or ensuring a diversity of perspectives.
Ha I definitely did miss it! Why are there applications though for a virtual event? That seems like an easy opportunity to be much more open like Scott is suggesting.
Anyone interested in an EA unconference on gather dot town during EA global? Seems like an easy way to open up the event to those who weren’t selected by the annointed and/or can’t make it logistically. https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dsCTSCbfHWxmAr2ZT/open-ea-global
What are these FB threads that are being referenced out of curiosity? Feels very in-groupey.
A bit of a tangent though these comments strike me as indicative that EA is a very small community in many ways.
Why not be creative and have a virtual parallel EA global event? There’s lots of opportunity to be creative there.
For example it could be as simple as specified times for people to hop on the EA Gather dot town. There are also a lot of opportunities to match people creatively with pre-survey work and such.
Welcome!