That makes sense, but https://chat.openai.com/ and https://openai.com/blog seems like a different (sub)domain and still weird the first one appears in results.-|
Martin (Huge) Vlach
Karma: 1
Any idea why chatGPT is included among the sources/results?
see https://ibb.co/XyWL01P
or perhaps try yourself: https://ratsearch.blogspot.com/p/search-blogs.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=cap%20table&gsc.sort=
Points of interest/content for the directing docs:
Buybacks aka Shares Redeemability
Donating policies built-in to the founding agreement/constitution
Optimalish capitalization/ownership table/agreements have key importance in startup earning-to-give path for the positive impact provided when scale and profitability of the enterprise grows high.
So if perhaps even just a couple of founder teams aim in the road to multi-billion( $) valuation, the expected value of providing them with legal/investment doc structuring templates or/and advice could well be worth millions( per all following years where capitalism still dominates).
Similar could be proposed for tax effectivity, but that is less stable and likely less impactful in optimizing.
Both have the drawback that they likely put the bar of raising capital higher for bridging the gap to develop their products and services.Who should take this initiative? Charity Entrepreneurship mentioned they had some activity in Social Entrepreneurship and a positive perspective for For-profit Entrepreneurship donating 10+ % of revenues.
These are some links with reasonable likelihood of other relevant folks:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/funding-high-impact-for-profits
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/WmAkGj7JcnAbwxS2C/even-more-ambitious-altruistic-tech-efforts
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/LQFCtewacZ5ggxWdB/please-pitch-ideas-to-potential-ea-ctos
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/JtE2srazz4Yu6NcuQ/how-many-eas-failed-in-high-risk-high-reward-projects
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/eFQBaQfaNTjSM9LYL/resources-on-the-expected-value-of-founding-a-for-profit
Fixed, thanks @Daniel_Friedrich!
___
If it is anyhow possible for the results( from the second and third tab/option) to have a backling to the main page, I would feel some comfort from that, esp. when sharing a results list.
so I/we..?
better do what recommended in https://80000hours.org/articles/accidental-harm/#3-have-a-degree-of-humility ?
The link is to be https://purpose-economy.org/en/purpose-foundation/ ,
very interesting document,
if anyone wishes to discuss, please meet me via http://linktr.ee/uhuge
Is this (made by )you?
Přesunuto na zítřek či čtvrtek.
Wasn’t this very similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem#The_Golem_of_Che%C5%82m from much earlier?
Edit: reading further it seems to be the consensus.
Dumb ways to die,
so many dumb ways to die
dumb ways to die
from super-intelligent AI.Now as thas has been a really catchy commercial, when similar animation combined with the most discussed scenarios could steer some reasonable minds towards taking the problem seriously.
The form for networking is rather unusable on mobile, it should do some auto-saving or work multi-stage.-(
https://airtable.com/shrdtkHEBO9GU1gok
~10m lost for me.
I consider myself an active EA, but you provide very little factual information in your introduction, to me almost zero anchoring as to what proto-schisms are you referring to..? Some candidates seems long termism vs. confidently/obviously good charity operations; s-risks × x-risks or hierarchical vs. decentalized ops. I have no clue if/which of those you find painstaking or risky for the continuation of the community.–?
Fresh take on that idea: one-off container with reactive material that will change colour when the container gets unsealed reading in the same manner as litmus paper. Sub-dollar range for each. I’m actually gathering a grant to get started and open to any kind of cooperation.
On par with Ought I’d put Anthropic (AI).
Was the slavery and oppression propagated by the same “memetic evolution” mechanics though?
For more than is reasonable I’m sorry for his personal tragedy. “Is Sam addicted to gambling?”.: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/anessaallensantos_sam-bankman-fried-tries-to-explain-himself-activity-6998826251700305920-j1Z-?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop → https://www-vox-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/future-perfect/23462333/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-cryptocurrency-effective-altruism-crypto-bahamas-philanthropy
Feel we should replace that source of funds in some sustainable way. Perhaps build up a good stablecoin eco or robust limit order business. ( Ping me for getting started. )
As this page comes first on Google search for the contest, I’d like to suggest linking the results on the beginning of end of this article now.
This comes pretty high on some google queries.
I suggest some tidying: Lesswrong (2023) -- the year seems off, does not match the elements under the link.
A space is missing before the last sentence of the first paragraph.