I agree with this and I’m glad you wrote it.
To steelman the other side I would point to 16th century new world encounters between Europeans and Natives. It seems like this was a case where the technological advantage of the Europeans made conquest better than comparative advantage trade.
The high productivity of the Europeans made it easy for them to lawfully accumulate wealth (e.g buying large tracts of land for small quantities of manufactured goods), but they still often chose to take land by conquest rather than trade.
Maybe transaction frictions were higher here than they might be with AIs since we’d share a language and be able to use AI tools to communicate.
Maxwell Tabarrok
Karma: 830
American Acceleration vs Development
Claude vs GPT
Don’t Endorse the Idea of Market Failure
We Need Major, But Not Radical, FDA Reform
When Should Copyright Get Shorter?
A Puzzle in Voter Behavior
Practicing my Handwriting in 1439
Surgery Works Well Without The FDA
Against the Burden of Knowledge
Land Reclamation is in the 9th Circle of Stagnation Hell
AI Girlfriends Won’t Matter Much
Contra Scott on Abolishing the FDA
The Offense-Defense Balance Rarely Changes
Why Did NEPA Peak in 2016?
Fertility as Metascience
R&D is a Huge Externality, So Why Do Markets Do So Much of it?
Thank you for reading and for the kind words :)
Thank you for reading and for your well thought out comment!