Blogging and editing at [/nickai/](https://www.thinkingmuchbetter.com/nickai/). PM me your fluid-g-increasing ideas. (Formerly President/VP of the EA Club at RIT (NY, USA)).
Genderfluid (differs on hour/day-ish timescale.). It’s not a multiple-personality thing.
We ought to have a new word, besides “steelmanning”, for “I think this idea is bad, but it made me think of another, much stronger idea that sounds similar, and I want to look at that idea now and ignore the first idea and probably whoever was advocating it”.
Good points, thanks! (Mainly the list part)
Thank you! Another person pointed this out on LW.
This post/cause seems sorely underrated; e.g. what org exists can someone donate to, for mass case detection? It has such a high potential lives-saved-per-$1,000!
OK, thanks! Also, after more consideration and object-level thinking about the questions, I will probably write a good bit of prose anyway.
These details help, thank you!
I have a question.
IF:
we can submit multiple entries (but only one will win), AND
judging is based on 67% uncovering considerations and 33% clarifying concepts,
THEN, would you prefer if I:
make one large entry that puts all my research/ideas/information in one place, OR
make several smaller entries, each one focusing on a single idea?
(Assuming this is for answering one question. Presumably, since multiple entries are allowed, I could duplicate this strategy for the other question, or even use a different one for each. But if I’m wrong about this, I’d also like to know that!)
\d{1,5}\s\w.\s(\b\w*\b\s){1,2}\w*. (Source)
Enough cheating at business, we must cheat at League next
It is more dramatic to break the curfew tho
Comment
I was almost too lazy to even write my post this year, please TLDR this setup and explain how I can receive money and social status and other personal gains thank you
Yeah, we’d hope there’s a good bit of existing pedagogy that applies to this. Not much stood out to me, but maybe I haven’t looked hard enough at the field.