ideally you shouldnt be risk-averse with your donations though
rafa_fanboy
you dont need to specifically offset that, just donate to the best charity. you already have a net positive impact by being ea anyway
do 3rd world countries eat factory farmed meat?
why does it have to be objective ?
i think carl shulman estimated chickens have 250k neurons, u could use that
is there a resource for e2g out there that doesnt focus on super hard jobs like ib/consulting? (other than this one) i think accounting is a pretty good career but idk if i could be donating more doing something else
frugal living course, or just look it up http://yboris.com/frugality/
what about the poor meat eater problem ? all donors should wait for clean meat to arrive before giving to poverty and maybe causing more harm to the animals there
Dont forget the $13.3M grant the FHI got a few weeks ago, I felt like that was huge for EA
1st = clean meat/GFI 2nd = diet change/THL
That’s what happens when everyone who runs EA graduated from either an Ivy League school or Oxford
question: how do u find ratio of chicken suffering to human ? is it square root # of neurons, so 20:1 ?
what charities do u recommend, gfi ?
make a thread and we can try to mass email them
- 11 Feb 2019 20:23 UTC; 3 points) 's comment on How to use the Forum by (
either way im sure earning to give has a higher impact because 1 it lets you change your mind about the best charity and 2 you dont have to fill a talent gap which is hard to do i think. also water is not an effective cause area
how many priority research orgs do we need
ea in general has no mainstream exposure except that vox series
individual eas should be investing in high-risk high-reward for EV too right ?