You could ask the same question about worms, mites or nematodes.
I think the reductio ad absurdum that if any of these things matter even slightly, then all human moral concerns become completely irrelevant, means we need a high bar for believing this
I think itâs worthwhile distinguishing between the demandingness objection as an argument against insect/âworm/âmite/ânematodesâ interests mattering, and as an argument against them being sentient. I think you can make the first case but not the second.
Thereâs a distinction in theory but in practice the vague definition of âsentienceâ is so tied to moral relevance I donât think you can argue for one without also arguing for the other.
The question âdoes a worm feel painâ isnât really asking âdoes the worm have nociceptors and some degree of integration of those nociceptive signals that causes learning and behavioural changesâ. Itâs really asking, at the core, âdoes a worm âfeel painâ in a way thatâs morally importantâ
What would be evidence for sentience in your view?
You could ask the same question about worms, mites or nematodes.
I think the reductio ad absurdum that if any of these things matter even slightly, then all human moral concerns become completely irrelevant, means we need a high bar for believing this
I think itâs worthwhile distinguishing between the demandingness objection as an argument against insect/âworm/âmite/ânematodesâ interests mattering, and as an argument against them being sentient. I think you can make the first case but not the second.
Thereâs a distinction in theory but in practice the vague definition of âsentienceâ is so tied to moral relevance I donât think you can argue for one without also arguing for the other.
The question âdoes a worm feel painâ isnât really asking âdoes the worm have nociceptors and some degree of integration of those nociceptive signals that causes learning and behavioural changesâ. Itâs really asking, at the core, âdoes a worm âfeel painâ in a way thatâs morally importantâ