I think ādonāt work on climate change[1] if it would trade off against helping one currently identifiable person with a strong needā is a really bizarre/āundesirable conclusion for a moral theory to come to, since if widely adopted it seems like this would lead to no one being left to work on climate change. The prospective climate change scientists would instead earn-to-give for AMF.
I think this argument doesnāt quite go through as stated, because AMF doesnāt have an infinite funding gap. If everybody on Earth (or even, say, 10% of the richest 10% of people) acted on the version of contractualism that mandated donating significantly to AMF as a way to discharge their moral obligations, weāll be well-past the point where anybody who wants and needs a bednet can have one.
That said, I think a slightly revised version of your argument can still work. In a contractualist world, people should be willing to give almost unlimited resources to a single identifiable victim than working on large-scale moral issues, or having fun.
Thanks for the reply.
I think ādonāt work on climate change[1] if it would trade off against helping one currently identifiable person with a strong needā is a really bizarre/āundesirable conclusion for a moral theory to come to, since if widely adopted it seems like this would lead to no one being left to work on climate change. The prospective climate change scientists would instead earn-to-give for AMF.
Or bettering relations between countries to prevent war, or preventing the rise of a totalitarian regime, etc.
I think this argument doesnāt quite go through as stated, because AMF doesnāt have an infinite funding gap. If everybody on Earth (or even, say, 10% of the richest 10% of people) acted on the version of contractualism that mandated donating significantly to AMF as a way to discharge their moral obligations, weāll be well-past the point where anybody who wants and needs a bednet can have one.
That said, I think a slightly revised version of your argument can still work. In a contractualist world, people should be willing to give almost unlimited resources to a single identifiable victim than working on large-scale moral issues, or having fun.